Best medical billing software (7 sources)

Every row is a verbatim sentence read from the named source's own page through our fetch service on the date shown, hash-pinned to the stored read (the sha of the page's visible text; the raw page is mirrored to R2).

7 of the 28 named sources that could be read published a usable figure; 21 published none and are recorded as not published, never filled in; 2 could not be read (blocked, dead or unreachable) and count nowhere.

The headline figures (median, minimum, maximum, quartiles) are over ONE figure per source in USD (a source's median where its page yielded several accepted sentences), so N counts sources, never sentences; 195 candidate sentence(s) were refused by a reviewer with the reason recorded.

The fuller derivation this dataset is chartered to grow into (not yet what the figures above are; they are each source's own published figure as read): one row per vendor per plan: the published price, its unit (per provider per month, per user, per location, percent of collections, per claim), what the plan includes, and whether the vendor publishes at all - so the index can say what share of this market will state a number, which is the finding, since the category pages that rank for these queries list vendors without one.

The billing services are priced on the same axis as the software they replace, and the insurers on annual premium, so a practice can compare the whole cost of getting paid.

195 candidate sentences on these pages were refused by a reviewer; each refusal and its reason is recorded in the review ledger.